[Mikey]

Upon doing some research of last year's numbers, the 48th ranked WR had roughly the same amount of points as the 12th ranked TE.

So I figured the W/T option instead of a straight up TE may allow us a little freedom and keep some teams from having to carry shitty TE's.

But again, it doesn't matter to me, Just thinking outside the box a little.

[DevSop]

Gotta play a TE no matter how bad it is. It's like a catcher in baseball or something like that. Lineups should probably be QB, 2 RB, 3 WR, TE, K, Def.

[Lucky]

That was my thinking but I'm not experienced enough to comfortably say it. Its why I use LF, CF, RF instead of 3 OF positions every year. I was arguing with a friend of mine who commishs another league I'm in about it. He refuses to budge on the 3 OFer thing because filling the 3 OFer positions is "too hard." I say that's the point and finding 3 OFers is too easy. Put a little strategy into it and make people think. And make them deal with the tough positions to fill. The ones who draft early or smart will theoretically profit from it.

And in my little fantasy football experience one of my few vivid memories is I've never had a TE that didn't suck nuts.

[The Canadian Content]

I agree with DevSop's lineup suggestion. It's the classic fantasy football roster.

[Attitude Adjuster]

I second Devil. Be a man, play with a tight end. Er, wait, that didn't come out right...

[Mikey]

3 wide and a TE it is.

[National Champion Chris Cole]

How many do we carry on the roster? Are we just carrying nine or will we have some backups/subs?

[The Canadian Content]

Mike's got 15 rounds listed, so it looks like
QB
RB
RB
WR
WR
WR
TE
K
DEF
BN
BN
BN
BN
BN
BN

[Mikey]

That's affirmative.

[DevSop]

Only 5 for the bench? In football with byes? Most leagues I'm in basically have a bench the size of the roster to be fair, but this could be interesting. Free agents are going to be good.

[The Canadian Content]

It's actually 6 bench, not 5. Gives you the opportunity to backup every position.

[DevSop]

I think I made a boo-boo with my draft. Really thought it was longer. Didn't draft a K or Defense til my last 2 picks, only have 2 qb's and 4wr's. No backups for TE, kicker, or defense. Carrying 6 RB's might be a tad too much. Anyone looking for depth there and have an extra wr, te, or anything...let me know.

[Lucky]

The scary thing is that half of what you said was intentional on my part. Not taking a def or k until the last 2 rounds, no backups for TE, K, or Def. I've got 5 WR, 4 RB, and 3 QB but one of those spots is going to have to become a flex spot for when I need to pick up a K, Def, or TE during bye weeks. Unless my guys prove so mediocre that I'm comfortable just dropping them, but I doubt I'll be dumping Vernon Davis in Week 6.

My roster is fluid. I'm not terribly happy but not terribly unhappy about my draft. Going to run it by a friend later and see what he thinks but I'm open to changes.