RAW is IED?
Jan 27, 2009 4:13:42 GMT -5
Post by creepy on Jan 27, 2009 4:13:42 GMT -5
So is anyone else feeling uncomfortable that the WWE is using Intermittent Explosive Disorder as a storyline to explain why Orton is a hothead that beats his boss and justifies it? Since the WWE is storyline driven, predetermined, fake or whatever, should they really be using a disorder like this to justify one of the wrestlers behavior? He's going to sue if he gets fired? Can CM Punk sue the WWE for unsafe working enviroments due to them hiring a guy that potentially could just end his career because of an argument with this guy? Can Vince sue Orton for medical bills? Can the people who actually have IED sue the 'E for poor taste?
This reminds me of two different scenarios of poor taste. One is that fucking Comcast HD commercial that has people intimating an intervention because the guy is watching HD from Direct TV that doesn't have as many HD channels as Comcast. The guy is wondering why his family and friends are acting all somber like and a stranger is acting serious with him. Then...BOOM!.... "You could have way more HD!" or some shit. I don't get offended very easily at all, but I can see easily how people can be offended by that. Just poor, poor taste.
The other scenario is that pro football player last year that sued the Bucs, I think, because he was fired because he's an alcoholic. He missed practices and meetings because of his drinking and threatened legal action on the basis of his disease.
So can everyone in the WWE claim IED and just go apeshit on everyone and threaten legal action if they are disciplined? I don't get it. I didn't like that storyline last week and I thought Randy's acting was good to convey his emotions, but the whole reason why he was kicking the shit out of Vince, I thought, was stupid. The boss tells you to shut the fuck up and apologize and you beat the crap out of him? Then he acts like that was his split personality that did that. If I did that to my boss, then I'd be in jail, IED or no IED. And that's my problem with it. This IE Disorder is being trivialized because the WWE wants to use it in a storyline.
I don't know. I guess it doesn't matter that much to me, and I hadn't heard of IED before this, but dang, it seems pretty classless that the WWE would use this to explain why a guy beats the shit out of his boss and gets away with it. It's no necrophilia, it's no limo blowing up, it's no drugged up bride or miscarriage angle or anything that seems too "fake." It seems like this could be real if it wasn't a part of the show, and that's why it justs wrong with me, I guess.
OK, Lucky. Tear me a new one. I assume I'm overreacting.
Is that really fucking Carcetti is Cena's new movie?
This reminds me of two different scenarios of poor taste. One is that fucking Comcast HD commercial that has people intimating an intervention because the guy is watching HD from Direct TV that doesn't have as many HD channels as Comcast. The guy is wondering why his family and friends are acting all somber like and a stranger is acting serious with him. Then...BOOM!.... "You could have way more HD!" or some shit. I don't get offended very easily at all, but I can see easily how people can be offended by that. Just poor, poor taste.
The other scenario is that pro football player last year that sued the Bucs, I think, because he was fired because he's an alcoholic. He missed practices and meetings because of his drinking and threatened legal action on the basis of his disease.
So can everyone in the WWE claim IED and just go apeshit on everyone and threaten legal action if they are disciplined? I don't get it. I didn't like that storyline last week and I thought Randy's acting was good to convey his emotions, but the whole reason why he was kicking the shit out of Vince, I thought, was stupid. The boss tells you to shut the fuck up and apologize and you beat the crap out of him? Then he acts like that was his split personality that did that. If I did that to my boss, then I'd be in jail, IED or no IED. And that's my problem with it. This IE Disorder is being trivialized because the WWE wants to use it in a storyline.
I don't know. I guess it doesn't matter that much to me, and I hadn't heard of IED before this, but dang, it seems pretty classless that the WWE would use this to explain why a guy beats the shit out of his boss and gets away with it. It's no necrophilia, it's no limo blowing up, it's no drugged up bride or miscarriage angle or anything that seems too "fake." It seems like this could be real if it wasn't a part of the show, and that's why it justs wrong with me, I guess.
OK, Lucky. Tear me a new one. I assume I'm overreacting.
Is that really fucking Carcetti is Cena's new movie?