2013 rule changes (flex position) | Pun's House!

Infocenter

2013 rule changes (flex position)

Reply

New

Poll

« Prev
1
Next »

Attitude Adjuster Administrator Parvini Wannabe Progress? FLIBBILDY FLOO!! Posts: 3,260 Online: May 4, 2024 12:04:20 GMT -5	2013 rule changes (flex position) Jan 20, 2013 20:57:23 GMT -5 Quote Select Post Deselect Post Link to Post Back to Top Post by Attitude Adjuster on Jan 20, 2013 20:57:23 GMT -5 The flex position will be either a running back, receiver or tight end. Quarterbacks, kickers and defenses are not considered flex position candidates.
	Sting is the dumbest man in wrestling. That's a well established fact. I'd personally find it offensive and out of character if Sting didn't volunteer to do the stupid thing. --Lucky Lopez

Sportsguy Moderator Saul Taker The Champ Is Here. Posts: 8,660 Online: May 4, 2024 9:19:07 GMT -5	2013 rule changes (flex position) Jan 20, 2013 23:02:38 GMT -5 Quote Select Post Deselect Post Link to Post Back to Top Post by Sportsguy on Jan 20, 2013 23:02:38 GMT -5 2 backs, 2 wr, 1 te, one flex sounds perfect to me
	3 Time 3 Time 3 Time OOWF World Champion.

Deadly Global Moderator That Guy Posts: 7,583 Online: Oct 21, 2023 14:56:03 GMT -5	2013 rule changes (flex position) Jan 20, 2013 23:04:48 GMT -5 Quote Select Post Deselect Post Link to Post Back to Top Post by Deadly on Jan 20, 2013 23:04:48 GMT -5 Voting for 2/2/Flex, but I'd rather have no flex at all than 2/3/Flex. That's way too many starters. I'm in a league that did that this year for the first time and everyone hates it. Changing it back next season.
	Last Edit: Jan 20, 2013 23:05:17 GMT -5 by Deadly

DevSop Global Moderator TV for Vendetta Co-Host Posts: 14,104 Online: Now	2013 rule changes (flex position) Jan 20, 2013 23:07:00 GMT -5 Quote Select Post Deselect Post Link to Post Back to Top Post by DevSop on Jan 20, 2013 23:07:00 GMT -5 I'm okay with 2/2 Flex. I voted for 2/3 Flex just cause I like deeper leagues, but totally okay with a 2/2.

The Canadian Content Administrator More like AdministraThor, amirite? Beer Money Podcast Posts: 19,213 Online: May 4, 2024 13:03:42 GMT -5	2013 rule changes (flex position) Jan 21, 2013 14:08:05 GMT -5 Quote Select Post Deselect Post Link to Post Back to Top Post by The Canadian Content on Jan 21, 2013 14:08:05 GMT -5 If part of the purpose of adding a flex position is to eliminate some bottom of the barrel WRs, there's no sense in adding a potential 4th WR. I'm for replacing a WR spot with a flex.
	The Beer Money Podcast: It's your conversation, we just do most of the talking.

Attitude Adjuster Administrator Parvini Wannabe Progress? FLIBBILDY FLOO!! Posts: 3,260 Online: May 4, 2024 12:04:20 GMT -5	2013 rule changes (flex position) Feb 5, 2013 11:23:02 GMT -5 Quote Select Post Deselect Post Link to Post Back to Top Post by Attitude Adjuster on Feb 5, 2013 11:23:02 GMT -5 Poll is closed, and we have a definitive rule change. Next year the roster will be 1 QB, 2 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE, 1 Flex, 1 K, 1 DT/ST. The flex position is either a RB, WR or TE.
	Sting is the dumbest man in wrestling. That's a well established fact. I'd personally find it offensive and out of character if Sting didn't volunteer to do the stupid thing. --Lucky Lopez

Jack Quinn Administrator Trust Me Posts: 9,749 Online: Feb 21, 2024 20:56:30 GMT -5	2013 rule changes (flex position) Mar 4, 2013 2:52:38 GMT -5 Quote Select Post Deselect Post Link to Post Back to Top Post by Jack Quinn on Mar 4, 2013 2:52:38 GMT -5 I approve of this change
	The Phillies are everything I hoped the Mets would be - a team that plays their fucking asses off for all 27 outs. They're never out of a game. Solly 10/20/09

Reply

Quick Reply